How to use this checklist
- Changing equipment, structure, piping, controls, guarding, access or operating duty.
- Replacing an item with something that is not genuinely like-for-like.
- Adding reinforcement, brackets, supports, platforms or attachments to existing plant.
- Preparing a scope for an internal engineer, consultant, OEM or fabrication contractor.
- Declaring a modification safe or compliant simply because every box is checked.
- Replacing a formal management-of-change process used by the site or organisation.
- Bypassing project-specific design, verification, certification or statutory requirements.
- Treating an unknown failure mechanism as a straightforward modification scope.
Stop and escalate when
These conditions deserve an explicit competent-person decision rather than being treated as routine checklist gaps.
The change affects a pressure boundary, lifting duty, rated capacity or primary load path.
A guard, interlock, emergency stop, protective device or other safety function is being altered.
The original material, design basis or allowable operating limits cannot be established.
The asset has repeated cracking, deformation, leakage or other unresolved failure history.
The proposed change transfers load into existing plant that has not been checked for the new action.
Working checklist
Your assessment is stored in this browser. Assign an explicit outcome, record the evidence behind it, and capture actions for every gap or unclear item.
Identify the asset and assessment basis
0 of 48 items have an explicit screening outcome.
1. Identify the asset and the reason for change
Start with the problem and the current asset, not with a preferred solution.
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
2. Establish the original engineering basis
The engineer needs to know what justified the existing asset before judging the proposed final state.
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
3. Define every part of the proposed change
Small physical changes can create large engineering consequences when they alter stiffness, load path, controls or interfaces.
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
4. Check loads, hazards and consequences
The modification scope should identify what could change in the safe operating basis, even before detailed calculations begin.
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
5. Define the engineering and verification pathway
Make the required outputs explicit before work is released for manufacture or installation.
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
6. Plan installation and close-out
A modification is not finished when the fabrication is installed. The final asset state must be traceable and supportable.
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Add measurement, evidence or notes
Record the final screening context
Note operating restrictions, missing documents, work orders, competent-person decisions or assumptions that affect the result.
Minimum useful attachment pack
The checklist is most useful when the evidence can travel with the request.
Five questions before you call it complete
Common gaps and weak evidence
The scope says 'add a gusset' or 'fit a larger motor' but never defines the actual problem, failure mechanism or performance objective.
Drawings show the new part but not what changes in load, duty, controls, access or interfaces.
The engineer designs to an old drawing while field modifications and previous repairs remain undocumented.
The hardware is fitted but as-built records, inspection results, procedures and maintenance tasks are never updated.