Do the drawings, risk assessment and manufacturer documents match the machine as it exists today?
What should I look for?
Check added conveyors, tooling, guards, robots, PLC changes, speed changes and other modifications.
A short check for obvious guarding, interlock, emergency-stop and modification-management gaps.
Use this to decide whether the current machine needs a deeper risk assessment or safety-control review. A manufacturer certificate is useful evidence, but it does not replace reassessment of the machine as it is actually installed and used today.
0 of 12 questions reviewed.
Check added conveyors, tooling, guards, robots, PLC changes, speed changes and other modifications.
Check front, rear, above, below and maintenance access—not just the operator side.
Look for reach-through gaps, missing infill, large openings and newly created access paths.
Check missing fasteners, bent mesh, temporary cable ties, propped-open covers and removed panels.
A switch clicking is not enough. Check the complete safety function and defined safe state.
Changes to speed, braking, motors or controls can invalidate an old safe-distance assumption.
Emergency stops are a backup control, not a substitute for guarding.
Ask operators and maintainers how the machine is actually used during faults and jams.
Consider electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, gravity, stored pressure and rotating energy.
A manufacturer certificate for the original machine does not automatically cover later modifications or repurposing.
Look for traceable evidence, not only verbal assurance that the system has always worked.
Repeated temporary fixes or open defects are a sign the control system needs deeper review.
Record the main defect, missing evidence, person responsible or follow-up action. Keep this short—the detailed checklist is available when a deeper record is needed.
The detailed version adds evidence expectations, typical gaps, escalation triggers, attachment packs and source basis.
Open detailed checklistIt helps identify obvious gaps and uncertain items. It does not replace the applicable Standard, manufacturer requirements, competent-person inspection, engineering assessment or site risk process.